Mention of BINARY_SIF in the current documentation is probably an error.
"the result BioPAX model (e.g., BINARY_SIF output ..."
But given that we provide the previous versions downloads, should the previous documentation be kept somewhere? Version 8 did contain output labeled BINARY_SIF:
Mention of BINARY_SIF in the current documentation is probably an error.
"the result BioPAX model (e.g., BINARY_SIF output ..."
But given that we provide the previous versions downloads, should the previous documentation be kept somewhere? Version 8 did contain output labeled BINARY_SIF:
http://www.pathwaycommons.org/archives/PC2/v8/