Closed moewew closed 4 years ago
Any news on this? Currently oscola is not really usable because of the errors.
Sorry to bother you about this again. The issue showed up again on TeX.SX a few days ago https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/532215/35864.
@PaulStanley If you are busy at the moment, I'd be happy to help you release an emergency update to CTAN with this fix and #10, so it can be included in TeX live 2020. (If you like you can give me permission to upload the fix to CTAN, so you don't have to do anything else.)
Would you mind? I thought I had done it 6 months ago, but I realise that I did it on my laptop and then didn't get round to regenerating the documentation and sending it to CTAN. I'm very sorry. If it's too much trouble, I can probably get to it on Tuesday.
Paul
-- Paul Stanley QC D +44 20 7147 7340 T + 44 20 7813 8000
Barrister regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you believe you have received this email in error, please do not read it further, but delete it and inform me that you have done so. Thank you.
From: moewew notifications@github.com Sent: 15 March 2020 15:14 To: PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex Cc: Paul Stanley QC; Mention Subject: Re: [PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex] Remove entry-level option declaration for url, doi, eprint (#8)
Sorry to bother you about this again. The issue showed up again on TeX.SX a few days ago https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/532215/35864.
@PaulStanleyhttps://github.com/PaulStanley If you are busy at the moment, I'd be happy to help you release an emergency update to CTAN with this fix and #10https://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/pull/10, so it can be included in TeX live 2020. (If you like you can give me permission to upload the fix to CTAN, so you don't have to do anything else.)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/pull/8#issuecomment-599223256, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ2SN2B5M2NOE3HVAOAJY3RHTWFDANCNFSM4JHONBYA.
You can add me to this repository as collaborator (https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/inviting-collaborators-to-a-personal-repository). Then I could merge the pull requests, update the documentation and (hopefully) build the documentation and package the bundle.
Because CTAN won't accept upload from random people you could either tell them to let me upload the updated package or I could send you the .zip
and you then upload it to CTAN.
I have merged both this and your other PR. I'm on a laptop which doesn't have a working TeX installation on it at the moment, so if you were able to make the Zip for CTAN that would be great: if you email it to me I will upload it. If that's a problem, I can do it tomorrow when I have access to a working system, Covid restrictions permitting. (I think you are a contributor, thanks to the PR merge, but if I'm wrong about that I'm afraid you will have to tell me how to fix it!)
I'm a contributor thanks to the merge (really: thanks!). But I don't have rights to push directly to the repository (without you having to merge a pull request) as a collaborator would (https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/inviting-collaborators-to-a-personal-repository).
But the collaborator business is not that pressing. I can just submit the documentation change as pull request and when you are happy with them, you can merge them and then I can build the .zip
for CTAN. (At the moment I'm fighting with the indices, but hopefully I should have that sorted soon).
The indices are nightmarish. I think there are comments at the end of the documentation which remind me how to do them!
-- Paul Stanley QC D +44 20 7147 7340 T + 44 20 7813 8000
Barrister regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you believe you have received this email in error, please do not read it further, but delete it and inform me that you have done so. Thank you.
From: moewew notifications@github.com Sent: 15 March 2020 16:00 To: PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex Cc: Paul Stanley QC; State change Subject: Re: [PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex] Remove entry-level option declaration for url, doi, eprint (#8)
I'm a contributor thanks to the merge (really: thanks!). But I don't have rights to push directly to the repository (without you having to merge a pull request) as a collaborator would (https://help.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/inviting-collaborators-to-a-personal-repository).
But the collaborator business is not that pressing. I can just submit the documentation change as pull request and when you are happy with them, you can merge them and then I can build the .zip for CTAN. (At the moment I'm fighting with the indices, but hopefully I should have that sorted soon).
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/pull/8#issuecomment-599228971, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ2SNYJBGG53VESTEJMXUDRHT3RVANCNFSM4JHONBYA.
I think I managed to build the documentation as intended and pushed https://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/commit/a65ad4468399b3ace4de73b911c28406f165623c. You should have the .zip
file in your email inbox (the mail was sent to the email address mentioned in the package readme).
Many thanks. I will upload it now! I'm sorry I've been so flaky about this. Other parts of life have somewhat run away with me.
Paul
-- Paul Stanley QC D +44 20 7147 7340 T + 44 20 7813 8000
Barrister regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you believe you have received this email in error, please do not read it further, but delete it and inform me that you have done so. Thank you.
From: moewew notifications@github.com Sent: 15 March 2020 16:51 To: PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex Cc: Paul Stanley QC; State change Subject: Re: [PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex] Remove entry-level option declaration for url, doi, eprint (#8)
I think I managed to build the documentation as intended and pushed a65ad44https://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/commit/a65ad4468399b3ace4de73b911c28406f165623c. You should have the .zip file in your email inbox (the mail was sent to the email address mentioned in the package readme).
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/pull/8#issuecomment-599235879, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ2SN4UJIHJYOURKPNRDATRHUBSFANCNFSM4JHONBYA.
Thanks. Uploaded. I credited you in the announcement using your github handle.
-- Paul Stanley QC D +44 20 7147 7340 T + 44 20 7813 8000
Barrister regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you believe you have received this email in error, please do not read it further, but delete it and inform me that you have done so. Thank you.
From: moewew notifications@github.com Sent: 15 March 2020 16:51 To: PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex Cc: Paul Stanley QC; State change Subject: Re: [PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex] Remove entry-level option declaration for url, doi, eprint (#8)
I think I managed to build the documentation as intended and pushed a65ad44https://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/commit/a65ad4468399b3ace4de73b911c28406f165623c. You should have the .zip file in your email inbox (the mail was sent to the email address mentioned in the package readme).
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PaulStanley/oscola-biblatex/pull/8#issuecomment-599235879, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ2SN4UJIHJYOURKPNRDATRHUBSFANCNFSM4JHONBYA.
biblatex
3.13 provides these by default (https://github.com/plk/biblatex/pull/877). Unfortunately, the declarations cause an error now sincebiblatex
checks for existing options and doesn't silently overwrite them.