This code seems to be following the GPLv3 license because of the header, but doesn't have the license file in the source. As a result it shows up as being proprietary on GitHub.
To remove the ambiguity, I've added the license file and the appropriate header to the example files that were proprietary otherwise.
This code seems to be following the GPLv3 license because of the header, but doesn't have the license file in the source. As a result it shows up as being proprietary on GitHub.
To remove the ambiguity, I've added the license file and the appropriate header to the example files that were proprietary otherwise.