Open FrankBoesing opened 2 years ago
Still slower than IAR with STM: https://www.eembc.org/viewer/?benchmark_seq=2533
Still slower than IAR with STM: https://www.eembc.org/viewer/?benchmark_seq=2533
Wrong: CoreMark on this page is 1082.4, which is good but not quite close to the T4. Now if you look at the latest H7's from ST it gets more interesting and better than T4's but not by much: https://www.eembc.org/viewer/?benchmark_seq=13276
2K performance run parameters for coremark.
CoreMark Size : 666
Total ticks : 15731
Total time (secs): 15.73
Iterations/Sec : 2542.75
Iterations : 40000
Compiler version : GCC10.3.1 20210621 (release)
Compiler flags : (flags unknown)
Memory location : STACK
seedcrc : 0xE9F5
[0]crclist : 0xE714
[0]crcmatrix : 0x1FD7
[0]crcstate : 0x8E3A
[0]crcfinal : 0x25B5
Correct operation validated. See README.md for run and reporting rules.
CoreMark 1.0 : 2542.75 / GCC10.3.1 20210621 (release) (flags unknown) / STACK