Backfire Correction

[UFO-101]

Correct inaccurate claim that protests have no "backfire" effects

My friend who previously worked at Social Change Lab reached out to note that there is substantial evidence for backfire effects from protests, that the linked study even acknowledges.

[netlify[bot]]

👷 Deploy request for pauseai pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	daed00a30e2c9246b562ce8984ae9399d6d7f2d6

[Wituareard]

Despite evidence from other studies suggesting the possibility, no “backfire” effects are observed for any group or protest type.

The worst result was no effect for Republicans. "suggesting the possibility" seems to refer to climate communication in general.

[UFO-101]

I wasn't referring to the new results of this paper, but other papers which this study cites

For example, studies have shown that providing conservatives and Republicans with climate information not only may have no effect but can instead produce “backfire” effects wherein support for climate policy or belief in anthropogenic climate change is actually reduced because of exposure to conflicting information (e.g., protests) (Dixon, Bullock, and Adams 2019; Hart and Nisbet 2012; Zhou 2016).

Given the partisan nature of climate change belief and the evidence for backfire effects in climate communication

[joepio]

The study you cite refers to providing climate information leading to backfire effects. Does this also apply to protests? Are there other studies measuring a backfire effect from protests?

Seems good to keep it factual in any case.

[joepio]

From. The studies discussion section:

Despite the plausible concern that certain forms of protest may cause the type of backfire effect observed in climate communication research, I find no evidence to justify that concern.

I feel like saying there are limited backfire effects is not an accurate reflection if there is no evidence.

Perhaps we should state "there is no evidence of backfire effects from protests"

[UFO-101]

From my friend who researches in this area

Will message in morning. Generally I feel pretty certain that it is well known that protests certainly CAN backfire. There’s a case study on the SCL website I did on the group SHAC, where it seemed very apparent that protest backfired. And SCL also did an RCT where most protest descriptions led to people disliking the protest group: https://www.socialchangelab.org/_files/ugd/2ed91c_35d9cc4567c849cbba9bab51ee5efa25.pdf

Now technically those are all mostly more disruptive than any previous Pause stuff (AFAIK), but I wouldn’t classify them as violent.

Let's wait till tomorrow, but I think it might be fair to update it to say:

There is little evidence for "backfire" effects from protests, unless the protests are highly disruptive or violent

[joepio]

I think saying little evidence suggests that there is some.

How about "there is no evidence of backfire from peaceful, non-disruptive protests."

[UFO-101]

I think little evidence is good. I don't have time to do a literature review, but I'm sure there are studies showing a backfire effect.