PazerOP / tf2_bot_detector

Automatically detects and votekicks cheaters/bots in TF2 casual.
MIT License
404 stars 56 forks source link

Votekicked someone who says they weren't a cheater #382

Closed ziggythehamster closed 2 years ago

ziggythehamster commented 2 years ago

This may not be the correct place to bring this up, so feel free to direct me to the right place.

I encountered a user today who is on the trusted list (https://tf2bdd.pazer.us/v1/steamids) who says they are not a cheater. I, of course, auto votekicked them. If they are in fact not a cheater, they shouldn't be on that list. They were a soldier when I was playing. I didn't see any evidence of cheats, but I see one comment on their profile about being a doubletap cheater from 11/18/2021. They were added to the list a few days after that. The entries on the trusted list don't have the proof section filled in (I fill the proof section in on my list and had assumed that was standard practice).

This is the entry on the trusted list:

{
    "attributes": [
        "cheater"
    ],
    "last_seen": {
        "player_name": "Runker",
        "time": 1637641032
    },
    "steamid": "[U:1:1230464212]"
},

And their profile link is http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199190729940.

Is there any chance that someone remembers why they added them? The player says they got added because they called Pazer a dork, which makes me lean toward them actually being a cheater (they know about this list and the author and their excuse is that Pazer is thin-skinned?), but if they aren't, they shouldn't get marked.

Barmem commented 2 years ago

bruh

BitmapDummy commented 2 years ago

If they are on the official list then they are guaranteed to have cheated in the past. Obviously these people would say things like that when they see you use the bot detector.

ziggythehamster commented 2 years ago

Well, this is the "trusted" list, not the official one, though both seem to be maintained by Pazer. I wasn't sure what the governance is for getting on the list in the first place, and it sounds like this is a deserved ban.

Kenajcrap commented 2 years ago

Third party lists such as the list you mentioned are not supported or condoned by the project, as it is said in the wiki. Some considerations:

ClusterConsultant commented 2 years ago

Nothing more needs to be said on this matter

ziggythehamster commented 2 years ago

Yeah, this was clarified in Discord - seems like it's on Pazer's VPS but not actually maintained by them. And also that people aren't added by mistake, so 100% this can be closed. Sorry for wasting your time :).

ClusterConsultant commented 2 years ago

It is not a waste of time to ask questions. The next time someone asks something similar I can point at this issue saving time in the future.