Hi there, and thanks for this fine piece of software! 🎉
I'm currently moving away from FreeMarker and I'm 99% sold on Pebble – except for one important factor (for me): Pebble expects the template model to be a Map<String, Object>, while FreeMarker doesn't. FreeMarker accepts any instance of a class, Map, List, String, anything really, and the template would work fine with it. But Pebble works only with a Map.
So, I wonder, how hard would it be to add an overload for evaluate() that accepts Object model? The easiest would probably be to convert the Object to a Map (via reflection) and then forward the call to the existing evaluate() method.
Hi there, and thanks for this fine piece of software! 🎉
I'm currently moving away from FreeMarker and I'm 99% sold on Pebble – except for one important factor (for me): Pebble expects the template model to be a
Map<String, Object>, while FreeMarker doesn't. FreeMarker accepts any instance of a class, Map, List, String, anything really, and the template would work fine with it. But Pebble works only with aMap.So, I wonder, how hard would it be to add an overload for
evaluate()that acceptsObject model? The easiest would probably be to convert theObjectto aMap(via reflection) and then forward the call to the existingevaluate()method.