Closed Aariq closed 2 years ago
If time is not given it will be NA by default. In that case we could replace with if (time == NA)
. If time is given, we can have other checks for validity (like, is it numeric? Alea’s Increasing so all(diff(time)) >0?, but that is beyond the scope of this bug.
Oh, I see now. Typically NULL
is used as a default, partially for this reason I think. If time is a list then if (time == NA)
will cause the same error (also NA == NA
returns NA
, not TRUE
). I'll poke around and see if changing default values to NULL
and conditionals to if(!is.null())
is possible without breaking too much other stuff. If that seems too "risky" then wrapping in all()
should fix it.
https://github.com/PecanProject/pecan/blob/fbfcd2f26e4bad20cff9009da49e04ad85c05314/base/utils/R/utils.R#L38
Should this line be
is.null()
instead ofis.na()
? When this gets called bymodel2netcdf.ED2()
,time
is a complex nested list.This results in a warning in older versions of R but are errors in R > 4.2.0 (see NEWS) Tests run on older versions of R should be run with with
_R_CHECK_LENGTH_1_CONDITION_=true
to catch these as errors (I will open a separate issue for this though once I confirm if they currently are not run like this)