As part of PEcAn's strategic planning and future grant writing, it would be useful to know what fraction of the current modeling community is covered by PEcAn. I'm envisioning mining Google Scholar or Web of Science to figure out
1) what terrestrial models are out there
2) the relative effort/influence of each model (number of papers, number of individuals, number of citations, etc)
3) trends through time for modeling activity (total and by model) so that we can demonstrate demand and identify the models that are most important and/or rising in importance.
Overall, I want to know what fraction of the community we're covering (e.g. Rosie mentioned at Flux Camp that CLM represented 40% of all land model runs in CMIP5) and strategically identify what teams we need to target next to be most effective.
As part of PEcAn's strategic planning and future grant writing, it would be useful to know what fraction of the current modeling community is covered by PEcAn. I'm envisioning mining Google Scholar or Web of Science to figure out
1) what terrestrial models are out there 2) the relative effort/influence of each model (number of papers, number of individuals, number of citations, etc) 3) trends through time for modeling activity (total and by model) so that we can demonstrate demand and identify the models that are most important and/or rising in importance.
Overall, I want to know what fraction of the community we're covering (e.g. Rosie mentioned at Flux Camp that CLM represented 40% of all land model runs in CMIP5) and strategically identify what teams we need to target next to be most effective.