Closed Remi-Gau closed 3 years ago
Ahoi hoi @Remi-Gau,
thanks for posting this interesting question.
Indeed, SPM
is a bit more "hands-on" concerning image file headers
than most other software. IIRC, @miykael even had names or so in there. However, this is definitely also an interaction with whatever folks at the scanner put in (e.g. sequence name
). Hm, I think as it is right now, BIDSonym
would not capture that. You would get a tsv
file for each image
you have containing all key-value
pairs present, but the date would not be indicated as "potentially problematic". This is actually something that should be noted and I'll try to add a date format finder so that whenever something like that is present BIDSonym
will flag it as "potentially problematic" in the respective tsv
file.
NB: it definitely won't delete/change such things as I don't want to open up the possibility of image header
modification (looking at you SPM
, hehe).
Hey.
Quickly realized this is in my dataset.
I am not sure how this horror (
27-Aug-2020 11:33:5.3325
) got into my header (I am suspecting the SPM DICOM import is trying to be TOO smart) but is that something that would be flagged by BIDSonym ?