search

Pelagicore / pelux-manifests

A set of manifests that can be used to build variants of PELUX
MIT License
12 stars 25 forks source link

core-image-pelux-qtauto doesn't build without neptune ui #67

Closed jeremiah closed 7 years ago

jeremiah commented 7 years ago

bitbake core-image-pelux-qtauto WARNING: Host distribution "Debian-9.1" has not been validated with this version of the build system; you may possibly experience unexpected failures. It is recommended that you use a tested distribution. Parsing recipes: 100% |################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 0:03:47 Parsing of 2097 .bb files complete (0 cached, 2097 parsed). 2817 targets, 342 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors. WARNING: No recipes available for: /home/jeremiah/pelux/sources/meta-pelux/recipes-qt/automotive/neptune-ui_git.bbappend /home/jeremiah/pelux/sources/meta-pelux/recipes-qt/automotive/qtapplicationmanager_git.bbappend NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'neptune-ui' (but /home/jeremiah/pelux/sources/meta-pelux/recipes-core/images/core-image-pelux-qtauto.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) NOTE: Runtime target 'neptune-ui' is unbuildable, removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['neptune-ui'] ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-pelux-qtauto' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-pelux-qtauto', 'neptune-ui']

tobsan commented 7 years ago

It looks like you don't have the qt layers added to your build. Are you using the right manifest? IIRC, you need to use the qt-enabled manifest in order to get the qt layers, which in turn enables you to build this image.

@GordanM what do you think about putting this image in a conditional layer directory like we've talked about with other recipes?

GordanM commented 7 years ago

@tobsan I've stated the solution here: https://github.com/Pelagicore/meta-pelux/issues/31. I would go with that solution, unless you have other ideas?

DunderRoffe commented 7 years ago

@GordanM this is different since @jeremiah explicitly wants to build qtauto

GordanM commented 7 years ago

@DunderRoffe thanks for mentioning that! I believe it to be a user error then. Though, the previous comment is valid for @tobsan 's question.

tobsan commented 7 years ago

If we went with the Pelagicore/meta-pelux/#31, then the qt image wouldn't be visible without the layer being there hence eliminating the problem.

jeremiah commented 7 years ago

I forgot to pull in the correct manifest. Still, when source a new build I get the option to build core-pelux-intel or core-pelux-intel-qtauto. This is a little confusing when it is not in fact available.

jeremiah commented 7 years ago

Fix: to build the core-pelux-intel-qtauto bring in the pelux-intel-qtauto manifest to allow bitbaking.