Closed noraj closed 11 months ago
If this become the official cme community fork.
At present, this is impossible... ¯\(ツ)/¯
Published this repository into the package source will cause another unnecessary conflict with porchetta
If this become the official cme community fork.
At present, this is impossible... ¯_(ツ)_/¯
https://github.com/Porchetta-Industries/CrackMapExec/discussions/801 was locked, it's pretty clear that the community will continue to work on CME on the fork and that bytebleeder wi'll abandon cme or shutdown prochetta.
Published this repository into the package source will cause another unnecessary conflict with porchetta
But anyway I'm just asking for git tags here, each package manager of each distro will choose which upstream repository to follow. And I guess if the community push changes here while porchetta repository stay stale or is archived this is just a question of time before the change will be reflected everywhere.
We can do this. Since we'll have to rename, we will need to do a whole bunch of work, including pip/apt configuration, etc. I assume with the rename we'll start at version 1, but internal discussion is on-going.
We have started using tags with the release of v1.0.0: https://github.com/Pennyw0rth/NetExec/releases/tag/v1.0.0
Ref. https://github.com/Porchetta-Industries/CrackMapExec/issues/800
If this become the official cme community fork, could you please recreate at least all previous git tags and create new git tags and github release for cme 6.0 and 6.1 please.