Open mortenfyhn opened 7 years ago
It was indeed deliberate, but I acknowledge that it's a bit counter-intuitive for the user.
The only real motivator for the current approach was to simplify the generation of bitmaps. So, a technical motivator, not a UX motivator.
I'll slate this issue for the 1.3.1.0 release. I don't know when I'll get around to it, but it'll get done eventually :)
Sounds good, it's hardly a pressing issue.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, 16:08 MetaFight, notifications@github.com wrote:
It was indeed deliberate, but I acknowledge that it's a bit counter-intuitive for the user.
The only real motivator for the current approach was to simplify the generation of bitmaps. So, a technical motivator, not a UX motivator.
I'll slate this issue for the 1.3.1.0 release. I don't know when I'll get around to it, but it'll get done eventually :)
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MetaFight/PowerBuddy/issues/10#issuecomment-287788741, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGVQ3MNB3t0_yOO79Q7_y8mFL0oGi6lMks5rnpZjgaJpZM4MiIcg .
Thanks for making the really nice icon editor!
I noticed one behaviour, and I'm not sure if it's intentional: If I select one power plan, set its icon colors, then repeat the process for the remaining power plans, and finally hit the apply button, only one of them gets applied. Maybe either open a "Do you want to apply?" prompt before letting the user select another plan if they haven't applied the current colours yet, or simply make the button apply all changes made.