tfiedor
commented
3 months ago Looks good. I'm wondering whether we should perhaps add at least one tox environment to test editable installs as well, so that we can somewhat reliably discover such issues early.
Good idea, done.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## devel #235 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage ? 99.12% ======================================== Files ? 147 Lines ? 10001 Branches ? 0 ======================================== Hits ? 9913 Misses ? 88 Partials ? 0 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Perfexionists/perun/pull/235/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Perfexionists) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [coverage-3.10](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Perfexionists/perun/pull/235/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Perfexionists) | `99.12% <100.00%> (?)` | | | [coverage-3.11](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Perfexionists/perun/pull/235/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Perfexionists) | `99.12% <100.00%> (?)` | | | [coverage-3.9](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Perfexionists/perun/pull/235/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Perfexionists) | `99.10% <100.00%> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Perfexionists#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.