Closed chrstphrchvz closed 4 years ago
This sounds like a MetaCPAN issue, not a CPAN-Meta issue (though I can see where the confusion comes from)
Would https://github.com/metacpan/metacpan-web/issues be a better place to bring this up?
Would https://github.com/metacpan/metacpan-web/issues be a better place to bring this up?
Yes, that'd be my best guess.
Thanks. It turns out someone may have already reported it there: https://github.com/metacpan/metacpan-web/issues/1957
In my list of distributions on MetaCPAN, one of the distributions has an inaccurate abstract:
Presumably this is because the distribution currently fails to specify the required
abstract
field, and which I should specify in a future release if I want this fixed.However I am curious how CPAN decides what to use instead when the abstract is "unknown", and whether it could choose a better fallback value. In this case, CPAN appears to be using the POD NAME section from a demo script (widgetTclpTk); a more logical choice would be from the module that the distribution is named for ("Tcl::pTk - Interface to Tcl/Tk with Perl/Tk compatible syntax").