Closed p5pRT closed 8 years ago
Upgrade Module-Metadata from 1.000027 to 1.000029-TRIAL (putting a trial version in blead is very much intentional\, to improve smoke coverage)
On Wed Sep 30 21:39:28 2015\, ether wrote:
Upgrade Module-Metadata from 1.000027 to 1.000029-TRIAL (putting a trial version in blead is very much intentional\, to improve smoke coverage)
Karen\, when I tried to apply this to blead I got 3 test failures in t/porting/manifest.t. See attached.
Could you take a look?
Thank you very much.
-- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org)
ok 10043 - MANIFEST sorted properly not ok 10044 - git ls-files gives the same number of files as MANIFEST lists ok 10045 - no duplicate files in MANIFEST not ok 10046 - Nothing added to the repo that isn't in MANIFEST not ok 10047 - Nothing added to the repo that isn't in MANIFEST ok 10048 - Nothing in the MANIFEST that isn't tracked by git ok 10049 - Nothing in the MANIFEST that isn't tracked by git # Failed test 10044 - git ls-files gives the same number of files as MANIFEST lists at porting/manifest.t line 91 # got "5679" # expected "5676" # Failed test 10046 - Nothing added to the repo that isn't in MANIFEST at porting/manifest.t line 103 # got "3" # expected "0" # Failed test 10047 - Nothing added to the repo that isn't in MANIFEST at porting/manifest.t line 104 # got "not in MANIFEST: cpan/Module-Metadata/t/lib/GeneratePackage.pm cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-package.t" # expected "not in MANIFEST: " Failed 3/10049 subtests
Test Summary Report
porting/manifest.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10049 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 10044\, 10046-10047 Files=1\, Tests=10049\, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.63 usr 0.05 sys + 0.14 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.83 CPU) Result: FAIL
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
On Thu Oct 01 03:53:18 2015\, jkeenan wrote:
On Wed Sep 30 21:39:28 2015\, ether wrote:
Upgrade Module-Metadata from 1.000027 to 1.000029-TRIAL (putting a trial version in blead is very much intentional\, to improve smoke coverage)
Karen\, when I tried to apply this to blead I got 3 test failures in t/porting/manifest.t. See attached.
Apologies\, I missed those errors!
Here is a revised patch that amends MANIFEST appropriately to reflect the new test files that were added. All tests pass.
On Thu Oct 01 11:14:41 2015\, ether wrote:
On Thu Oct 01 03:53:18 2015\, jkeenan wrote:
On Wed Sep 30 21:39:28 2015\, ether wrote:
Upgrade Module-Metadata from 1.000027 to 1.000029-TRIAL (putting a trial version in blead is very much intentional\, to improve smoke coverage)
Karen\, when I tried to apply this to blead I got 3 test failures in t/porting/manifest.t. See attached.
Apologies\, I missed those errors!
Here is a revised patch that amends MANIFEST appropriately to reflect the new test files that were added. All tests pass.
Pushed to blead in commit 0fa1f7e4e66a455cab6ccf1f9c49f2373c1ced80
When I ran make harness on Linux x86_64\, some of your TODO tests are passing:
##### Test Summary Report
../cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 221 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 199\, 202-203\, 206\, 210\, 212-213\, 215 Files=2386\, Tests=731729\, 155 wallclock secs (61.15 usr 6.71 sys + 363.66 cusr 31.62 csys = 463.14 CPU) Result: PASS #####
-- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org)
@jkeenan - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'
On Thu\, Oct 01\, 2015 at 04:54:22PM -0700\, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
Pushed to blead in commit 0fa1f7e4e66a455cab6ccf1f9c49f2373c1ced80
When I ran make harness on Linux x86_64\, some of your TODO tests are passing:
##### Test Summary Report ------------------- ../cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 221 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 199\, 202-203\, 206\, 210\, 212-213\, 215 Files=2386\, Tests=731729\, 155 wallclock secs (61.15 usr 6.71 sys + 363.66 cusr 31.62 csys = 463.14 CPU) Result: PASS #####
Karen\, is there any timescale for a new release that "fixes" these annoying TODO successes in blead?
-- Red sky at night - gerroff my land! Red sky at morning - gerroff my land! -- old farmers' sayings #14
That's planned for the next round of refactoring\, after I've fixed the last outstanding issue in the current TRIALs (which I hope to have done Real Soon Now).
Can you clarify how the TODO successes are annoying? Is it tickling a Porting test?
On Tue\, Nov 10\, 2015 at 9:12 AM\, Dave Mitchell via RT \< perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
On Thu\, Oct 01\, 2015 at 04:54:22PM -0700\, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
Pushed to blead in commit 0fa1f7e4e66a455cab6ccf1f9c49f2373c1ced80
When I ran make harness on Linux x86_64\, some of your TODO tests are passing:
##### Test Summary Report ------------------- ../cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 221 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 199\, 202-203\, 206\, 210\, 212-213\, 215 Files=2386\, Tests=731729\, 155 wallclock secs (61.15 usr 6.71 sys + 363.66 cusr 31.62 csys = 463.14 CPU) Result: PASS #####
Karen\, is there any timescale for a new release that "fixes" these annoying TODO successes in blead?
-- Red sky at night - gerroff my land! Red sky at morning - gerroff my land! -- old farmers' sayings #14
On Tue\, Nov 10\, 2015 at 11:12:16AM -0800\, Karen Etheridge wrote:
Can you clarify how the TODO successes are annoying? Is it tickling a Porting test?
No\, its not breaking anything; it's just that whenever you do a 'make test' on blead\, you get a whole bunch of extra text at the end that looks just like the text you get when one of the test scripts failed\, and you have to look again to confirm that nothing broke.
i.e. this:
Test Summary Report ------------------- ../cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 221 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 199\, 202-203\, 206\, 210\, 212-213\, 215 Files=2386\, Tests=731729\, 155 wallclock secs (61.15 usr 6.71 sys + 363.66 cusr 31.62 csys = 463.14 CPU) Result: PASS
looks remarkably similar to:
Test Summary Report ------------------- ../cpan/Module-Metadata/t/extract-version.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 221 Failed: 8) Failed tests:: 199\, 202-203\, 206\, 210\, 212-213\, 215 Files=2386\, Tests=731729\, 155 wallclock secs (61.15 usr 6.71 sys + 363.66 cusr 31.62 csys = 463.14 CPU) Result: FAIL
at first glance. Compared with all tests passing\, which is:
All tests successful. Files=2385\, Tests=725471\, 228 wallclock secs (187.25 usr 6.78 sys + 957.47 cusr 35.22 csys = 1186.72 CPU) Result: PASS
Similarly when looking at smoke fail reports.
-- The crew of the Enterprise encounter an alien life form which is surprisingly neither humanoid nor made from pure energy. -- Things That Never Happen in "Star Trek" #22
On Tue Nov 10 13:29:37 2015\, davem wrote:
On Tue\, Nov 10\, 2015 at 11:12:16AM -0800\, Karen Etheridge wrote:
Can you clarify how the TODO successes are annoying? Is it tickling a Porting test?
No\, its not breaking anything; it's just that whenever you do a 'make test' on blead\, you get a whole bunch of extra text at the end that looks just like the text you get when one of the test scripts failed\, and you have to look again to confirm that nothing broke.
I also agree it is annoying and it looks like things failed at first glance.
-- bulk88 ~ bulk88 at hotmail.com
Migrated from rt.perl.org#126230 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT126230$