Open scottchiefbaker opened 4 years ago
I'm curious what differences are in the output files opened in text-browsers.
links | lynx | w3m
Possibly also regarding Emacs eww.
I just installed and tested with lynx 2.8.9
and elinks 0.12-0.62
and both render the HTML5 how I would expect a text browser to do so.
Both are 100% readable and happy.
Are we really that worried about text based browsers in 2020?
Are we really that worried about text based browsers in 2020?
FWIW I still regularly use lynx for a variety of purposes.
I would posit that it's much more likely a text based browser will be used on the result of a command line tool.
pod2html
outputs older XHTML that does not play nicely with modern CSS frameworks (Bootstrap, and Bulma). Also the XHTML thatpod2html
outputs includes a tag:That causes Firefox some grief.
Update the tool to output HTML5 by default with an option to output XHTML with a flag (
--xhtml
).