search

PerlDancer / perldancer-website

Source code of the website of Dancer (written with Dancer)
47 stars 29 forks source link

Dancer2 and the website #29

Closed fcuny closed 11 years ago

fcuny commented 11 years ago

There's no mention of Dancer2 currently on the website.

Do we want to promote Dancer and Dancer 2 at the same time ? Or do we want to mention both, but only document things related to Dancer 2 ?

I can propose something quickly if we agree on this :)

fcuny commented 11 years ago

and just to be sure, I summon @sukria @xsawyerx @yanick @ambs @dagolden :)

dagolden commented 11 years ago

FWIW, I don't think Dancer 2 should be promoted much more until the documentation is vastly improved. Right now, it's a bad first experience. It should be mentioned as being "in beta" or some sort of hedge phrase.

ambs commented 11 years ago

I would refer both. Production => Dancer In Development (Alpha or Beta) => Dancer 2

xsawyerx commented 11 years ago

I tend to agree with @ambs but in the vein of @dagolden. That is, even though I would prefer to see Dancer2 mentioned as "Development", "Alpha", "Beta", "Whateva", I still think it's under-documented (to say the least), and that there's still a lot of work to be done.

fcuny commented 11 years ago

OK, I agree with you, let's wait a little bit more then.

Thanks.

yanick commented 11 years ago

I'll try to jump on the conversation later on today, once $dayjob is over and a few things have been taken care of. :-)

sukria commented 11 years ago

I agree, let's mention D2 as being beta as soon as the documentation is done.

sent on the way, short email! Le 31 juil. 2013 16:54, "Yanick Champoux" notifications@github.com a écrit :

I'll try to jump on the conversation later on today, once $dayjob is over and a few things have been taken care of. :-)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PerlDancer/perldancer-website/issues/29#issuecomment-21868313 .