Martial and Ovid and Juvenal

[PonteIneptique]

@balmas Even if I already started, I'd like to have your confirmation for this PR. The metadata file should be changed, but it has not that much importance right now...

[balmas]

@PonteIneptique if I understand correctly and you aren't intending this to be the final format of the metadata or full epidoc compliance, basically just getting these texts CTS-ized, with entities and betacode fixed. Is that right?

If so, then the only thing I think that needs to be fixed before merging is the lost of the indent attribute on the lines.

[lcerrato]

Please preserve as much header info as possible. Couple of minor notes. why is publisher being changed to Leipzig University (note there is a typo) from Leipzig? Book reads Leipzig, I believe. why was the initial markup info changed/removed? It read that Greg (GRC) did the initial markup and that appears to be gone now. We know that much of the text headers need revision but we plan on doing this in a comprehensive way. If there are specific questions about a text, happy to check these as needed. Also curious about the alternate titles.

[lcerrato]

Addendum: looks to be a Teubner version published in Leipzig.

[PonteIneptique]

So, concerning the CTS/RefsDecl, this commit does not concern this part, its purely ctsizing. The metadata files are rests from a former tentative. I'll remove them in a new commit.

For the rest, the rend="indent" is my fault. I didn't feel concern by a typographic attribute like that and should have (but still, what's the point of this attribute is a discussion I am wishing to have, to understand a point)

@lcerrato : Can you point to me which file you are talking about ? All of them ? Might be a huge mistake from my side.

[nevenjovanovic]

Thibault, my opinion is that, as generally in verse @rend="indent" marks a specific verse type, keeping this markup is of potential use for limiting analysis to pentameters etc. It is easier to reuse @rend than to select every other verse, because then you have first to exclude hexameter poetry etc.

[PonteIneptique]

Hey @nevenjovanovic, thanks for stopping by. Can I ask you why then we don't use directly a metric information ? Or maybe in a mail :')

[PonteIneptique]

Ok @lcerrato, my bad for the metadata. I am just feeding them back as I see. The only metadata I removed without doubts and intentionnaly is the "lang=greek" you can see in Ovid mostly, because it was due to the original not splitted file.

[PonteIneptique]

Also thanks for the meaning of GRC, which I am putting back instead of "unknown".

[PonteIneptique]

So, @balmas, @lcerrato and probably @simonastoyanova / @srdee (That's a lot, sorry for the spam) : the epigrammata file gave me some Epidoc troubles, could you have a look ?

[PonteIneptique]

Ok, there is epidoc error all over the place, maybe we could plan a call in the afternoon ( @simonastoyanova , @lcerrato , @balmas ? Who is the best to ask and the one available ?)

[PonteIneptique]

@balmas Concerning the cts.xml files, you have the real form here : https://github.com/PonteIneptique/cts-metadata

[balmas]

I think epidoc conversion should be handled separately because we are minting new version level URNs for the epidoc versions.

[PonteIneptique]

Note for anyone interested : putting back indent in Oxygen

Search (ctr+f) Find : n="([0-9]+)" Replace with: n="$1" render="indent" xpath : //l[@n and @n mod 2 = 0] Regular Expression : Checked

[PonteIneptique]

Ready for merge. Normally, data has been put back as far as I can see. :)

[PonteIneptique]

Because this commit list is huge, I am creating a new PR