In instances where verbs in the original text are marked as v. a. and n., this is not intended to be interpreted as a gender (with m / f / n options) but rather describing the forms of the verb.
v. a. and v. n. are consistently marked correctly as pos, but all of the instances of v. a. and n. are incorrectly marked with v. a., and, n. in separate tags.
This PR combines these into one single tag with text v. a. and n..
In instances where verbs in the original text are marked as
v. a. and n.
, this is not intended to be interpreted as a gender (with m / f / n options) but rather describing the forms of the verb.v. a.
andv. n.
are consistently marked correctly aspos
, but all of the instances ofv. a. and n.
are incorrectly marked withv. a.
,and
,n.
in separate tags.This PR combines these into one single tag with text
v. a. and n.
.