Closed nkprasad12 closed 1 year ago
Hi @nkprasad12 I wouldn't worry about the date of access in this case. That was an adaptation from the Chicago Manual for website bibliographical info (we get lots of these questions). For your type of reuse, feel free to just give the link to this repo with whatever explanation works for you. I'm sure that, given all of your wonderful efforts, it will be more than adequate!
Thanks @lcerrato !
From the readme: https://github.com/PerseusDL/lexica/tree/master/CTS_XML_TEI/perseus/pdllex/lat/ls#readme, this attribution is required:
I maintain a site that has an interface Lewis and Short with some convenient reading features (handling of abbreviations, syntax highlighting, mobile friendly, etc... - you can an example article here: https://www.morcus.net/dicts?q=habeo ). I am of course crediting Perseus Digital Library for the content, but I am seeking assistance on the second line:
I have a fork of the repo (at https://github.com/nkprasad12/lexica - this is because sometimes I have changes that are not yet ready for a Pull Request to your repo, and sometimes your repo has changes that I have not yet had time to validate for my abbreviation handling system) from which I am pulling the latest changes to deploy to my website on an automated basis several times a week.
Due to this, it is hard to maintain an accurate
date of access
from thePerseusDL/lexica
repo. For clarity, I was wondering whether it would be acceptable to display this slightly modified version of the attribution instead: