Closed PetRose closed 10 years ago
Line 10 of fix-9.0.1-dependencies you wrote the word have 2 times in the same spot.
Fixed.
I have merged your changes. I would prefer a that the minimal control-file did contain the current package.names of the software packages required. Not mensioning them there might lead to a successfull but incomplete install.
Can't the 9.0.0 control-file be used for 9.0.1 ?
Well, I tried to do that, but went into troubles of other dependencies that were (by the friendly Synaptic Package manager) noted as back level versions and so on. Then I found this guy who reported on the Domino install, and I tried that. I agree, the most correct would be to document required (and newest and hopefully backward compatible) packages and libs. The most important ones, I imagine is the Motif and X-libraries referenced, due to the weird Accept License dialogue via a console window. Maybe I will document my current Package status, so this could be used as some sort of reference, until we have a good dependency listing.
sound good. Talking about Notes - I'm in possesion of 9.0.0. This is actually en evaluation-copy, but it has worked well (meaning adequately - notes sux) for at least 6 months but I can't seem to find Notes 9.0.1. Where did you get it ?
Its also available as evaluation software, although I picked it via my companys Business Partner access to IBM Software Mall. Here's the 9.0.1 trial version on DeveloperWorks: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/downloads/ls/lsndad/index.html
Tak Peter......
Ved ud hvorfor evaluerings-udgaven bare virker og virker og virker. Jeg kan ikke rigtigt se hvad evaluerings-delen består i - andet end at IBM kan se at jeg har valgt at evaluere Notes.
Af interesse - hvor arbejder du? Jeg arbejder ved Leica Geosystems A/S i Odense.
Evaluering, går blot ud på at du med en 'hjemme-konstrueret' ID-fil der ikke er dannet fra en corporate administrators centrale CA, kan bruge Clienten. Det er først når du skal anvende i 'firma-øjemed' at man skal overveje om man skal bruge evaluerings udgaven eller ej. Jeg tror ikke der sw-mæssigt er nogen forskel, længere. I gamle dage var det Designer-delen som var beskyttet og ikke kunne 'evalueres' men sådan er det ikke længere. Jeg arbejder hos CSC Danmark (Valby HQ) og de har siden jeg først startede som konsulent for dem i 1997 (fastansat siden 2002) har de anvendt Lotus Notes som corporate Mail og Applications-system, også CSC Globalt. Jeg startede selv med Notes siden version 3.0a både på Client såvel som Server siden. Jeg er dog ikke fulltime programmør eller administrator men anvender det en smule til nogle af de Support systemer vi har internt. Hilsen Peter
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, 22:36, Søren Holm notifications@github.com wrote:
Tak Peter...... Ved ud hvorfor evaluerings-udgaven bare virker og virker og virker. Jeg kan ikke rigtigt se hvad evaluerings-delen består i - andet end at IBM kan se at jeg har valgt at evaluere Notes. Af interesse - hvor arbejder du? Jeg arbejder ved Leica Geosystems A/S i Odense. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
As suggested by master repo owner.