Closed mufeili closed 5 years ago
Hi Mufei,
You are correct indeed -- please see #12 . I should also remark (as you can see in its discussion) that for such a small training dataset, an entirely simpler attention mechanism may be more desirable.
Thanks, Petar
Thanks Petar!
Hi,
I've tried running your code on the Pubmed dataset using the configuration you mentioned in the paper. With
100
runs, the accuracy is about77.61 +- 0.78
while the paper reports79.0 +- 0.3
. I'm wondering if you have done some additional modifications as in the issue about Citeseer accuracy and it will be great if you can provide these details. Thanks a lot!