Closed programmer2514 closed 5 years ago
No, that doesn't make any sense, since then you only have around 3000 bytes left for dynamic allocation. Plus, there is in fact no size limit for lists, it's just that I defined L2 to be 2000 more than L1, but that doesn't mean L1(2000)
doesn't work.
I believe that the maximum list-based variable (list, sprite, string, etc.) size should be one of the following:
People would have to be more careful with variable allocation, but it would make many routines way easier.