Dear Dr.andrew
I'm sorry to bother you. I'm quite interested in following your work after reading your paper, "CNN-generated pictures are surprisingly easy to recognize... for now." But I ran into some issues.
How accurate is ResNet50's baseline performance without data augment? (In the paper, I just see AP; I don't seeACC.)
Do you aware of any CNNdetection follow-up work? Is this field's SOTA CNNdetection?
I will be appreciated for your reply, thank you very much!
Best wishes
I'm not sure whether I have the accuracy for the model without data augmentation at hand. However, I believe it will perform roughly at chance performance for unseen methods.
Dear Dr.andrew I'm sorry to bother you. I'm quite interested in following your work after reading your paper, "CNN-generated pictures are surprisingly easy to recognize... for now." But I ran into some issues.