PetoiCamp / OpenCat-Old

A programmable and highly maneuverable robotic cat for STEM education and AI-enhanced services.
https://www.petoi.com
1.36k stars 362 forks source link

modified as sold model and 3D printable #9

Closed manic-3dprint closed 5 years ago

borntoleave commented 5 years ago

Could you note the changes you made to the original file? Like the change on certain dimensions. And where did you buy the servo? There are so many "fake" TowerPro servos.

manic-3dprint commented 5 years ago

it is your one we modified to be manifold , a sold model more suitable for 3d print and import for other cad software

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 3:55 AM, Rongzhong Li notifications@github.com wrote:

Could you note the changes you made to the original file? Like the change on certain dimensions. And where did you buy the servo? There are so many "fake" TowerPro servos.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat/pull/9#issuecomment-447670886, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWmajNM6XIrq5BrS1BTbr_6QWGD9-UWsks5u5qVAgaJpZM4ZVOsa .

borntoleave commented 5 years ago

I'm not sure about the overall compatibility. The original STL model was created with Fusion360. I tried to import the two versions into Cura, both look fine:

screen shot 2018-12-17 at 11 33 12 am

I also tried to open the new one with Solidworks2018 today, and here's the error message: capture. Although it could be displayed correctly afterwards, the original file doesn't have the error message.

I noticed that you removed the 3 pin cable residue. Maybe it's introducing some gaps?

manic-3dprint commented 5 years ago

right, didnt put the wire part, can put it back

On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 1:13 AM, Rongzhong Li notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm not sure about the overall compatibility. The original STL model was created with Fusion360. I tried to import the two versions into Cura, both look fine: [image: screen shot 2018-12-17 at 11 33 12 am] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9747608/50102306-bd3b3c00-01f2-11e9-9cc9-c9d231b982af.png

I also tried to open the new one with Solidworks2018 today, and here's the error message: [image: capture] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9747608/50100341-3edc9b00-01ee-11e9-8f93-c767a8190f42.PNG . Although it could be displayed correctly afterwards, the original file doesn't have the error message.

I noticed that you removed the 3 pin cable residue. Maybe it's introducing some gaps?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat/pull/9#issuecomment-447923550, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWmajLH74ml7gZjGR2E7_MqPhYQZsMDYks5u59C9gaJpZM4ZVOsa .

manic-3dprint commented 5 years ago

and cura it is very good it can fix non manifold object for gcode , but if import to the mesh software meshmixer you see your one is not a sold model

On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 1:13 AM, Rongzhong Li notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm not sure about the overall compatibility. The original STL model was created with Fusion360. I tried to import the two versions into Cura, both look fine: [image: screen shot 2018-12-17 at 11 33 12 am] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9747608/50102306-bd3b3c00-01f2-11e9-9cc9-c9d231b982af.png

I also tried to open the new one with Solidworks2018 today, and here's the error message: [image: capture] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9747608/50100341-3edc9b00-01ee-11e9-8f93-c767a8190f42.PNG . Although it could be displayed correctly afterwards, the original file doesn't have the error message.

I noticed that you removed the 3 pin cable residue. Maybe it's introducing some gaps?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat/pull/9#issuecomment-447923550, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWmajLH74ml7gZjGR2E7_MqPhYQZsMDYks5u59C9gaJpZM4ZVOsa .

borntoleave commented 5 years ago

Please add back the wire. It's helpful for better wire arrangement when designing accessories. I'll merge after that revision. Thanks!

borntoleave commented 5 years ago

Done, although I noticed that there're long triangle signs on both sides if displayed on GitHub. https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat/blob/master/Resources/STL/mg90d.stl

BTW, here's my fusion model for MG92B: http://bit.ly/2zxWjth