PharmCAT reports an error pertinent to a NUDT15 variant.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not an deletion: G >GGGAGTC @ g.48037796delGAGTCG
<...truncated...>
The root of the issue is related to how a specific structural variant, rs746071566, is presented. rs746071566 is a structural variant with both deletion and insertion/duplication. When the insertion and the deletion of rs746071566 is presented as separate records, VCF processing tools (like bcftools) can be confused as what to call at this locus. (explained in the following section)
Please tell us about your environment:
PharmCAT Version: v0.8.0
JDK Version:
Environment: HPC
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, gitter, etc)
Issue with rs746071566
rs746071566 is a structural variant with both deletion and insertion/duplication.
As far as I understand, as the INS and the DEL are presented in different records, it will eventually be interpreted as the following in the format of VCF
# consider the position issue fixed
# deletion
chr13 48037782 rs746071566 AGGAGTC A . PASS . GT 0/0
# insertion
chr13 48037782 rs746071566 A AGGAGTC . PASS . GT 0/0
The two records are contradictory to each other. The DEL says a person is a AGGAGTC/AGGAGTC, not A/A. But the INS says that a person is A/A, not AGGAGTC/AGGAGTC.
The information rs746071566 is extracted from a specific source database that maintains the NUDT15 allele nomenclatures, right? Should we report the issue?
bug
PharmCAT reports an error pertinent to a NUDT15 variant.
The root of the issue is related to how a specific structural variant, rs746071566, is presented. rs746071566 is a structural variant with both deletion and insertion/duplication. When the insertion and the deletion of rs746071566 is presented as separate records, VCF processing tools (like bcftools) can be confused as what to call at this locus. (explained in the following section)
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, gitter, etc)
Issue with rs746071566
rs746071566 is a structural variant with both deletion and insertion/duplication.
As far as I understand, as the INS and the DEL are presented in different records, it will eventually be interpreted as the following in the format of VCF
The two records are contradictory to each other. The DEL says a person is a AGGAGTC/AGGAGTC, not A/A. But the INS says that a person is A/A, not AGGAGTC/AGGAGTC.
I believe the correct format should be
The information rs746071566 is extracted from a specific source database that maintains the NUDT15 allele nomenclatures, right? Should we report the issue?