Open faulhaber opened 3 months ago
I changed the primary statement to P137 (History), using Date of manuscript and Date of publication as values qualified by BD BDQ, ED, EDQ, and BASIS and made the changes in UI Sorted Properties. See BETA manid 1001 for the results. It separates out correctly MILESTONE_BD_W and MILESTONE_ED_W from MILESTONE_BD_P and MILESTONE_ED_P and correlates BD and ED in PBUI. However, the qualifiers BDQ, EDQ, and BASIS appear as qualifiers to both values, when they only apply to one. The only thing that occurs to me is to add additional columns on basis of BDQ, EDQ, and BASIS: BDQ_W, EDQ_W, and BASIS_W: and BDQ_P, EDQ_P, and BASIS_P. Closer but no cigar. More preprocessing?
P137 (History) cannot be used for Date of manuscript and Date of publication since it is already being used for RELATED_EVENT. I have found P442 (Type of event) as a substitute and rewritten the schema.
Problem: Beginning Date (BD) and Ending Date (ED) must be correlated as in "Copied" in the legacy web. BETA manid 1002.
Date of Artifact (P536) (for MSS) and Date of publication (P222) (for editions) both take datatype Point in Time: YYYY-MM-DD. When either property is used as a Statement there is no way to correlate BD and ED.. They appear as separate values in sequential order in pb.cog. See BETA manid [https://database.factgrid.de/wiki/Item:Q452742](1001.) It may be necessary to change the Property to something that takes an item and use Date of manuscript as the primary statement qualified by BD BDQ, ED, EDQ, and BASIS. Same for Date of publication. It will be necessary to make the Property look like appropriate metadata.
This is the same issue as MILESTONE in BIO, where we use History (P137).