Some more issues after corrections

[frenbox]

• Line 293-294 equation number is missing.
• Line 356, The value of HasRem label for NSBH depends on ... this sentence is true but so are BBH and BNS. We should either add add BBH and BNS in the mix or just remove this sentence.
• Line 383, is that sentence correct?
• Line 456, are we using "worse" ?
• Paragraph 457. Is the statement correct?
• Line 480, System's component mass ..., Implication of this sentence seems unclear.
• Line 579, may be add based on differences of its neighbors

[cavaglia]

This will have to be implemented after PnP. For the three questions, please propose new wording.

[miqmiq]

• Line 293-294 equation number is missing. Agree with this.
• Line 356, The value of HasRem label for NSBH depends on ... this sentence is true but so are BBH and BNS. We should either add add BBH and BNS in the mix or just remove this sentence. That's true, I would remove it, since it's obvious that the labels depend on the choice of the EOS.
• Line 383, is that sentence correct? It's not, I would remove "the latter" since we only mention one data set, D_S. I would say "and use this set to calculate"
• Line 456, are we using "worse" ? We can do it the other way around: "RF performs similarly to KNN for GstLAL but KNN outperforms RF for the other pipelines".
• Paragraph 457. Is the statement correct? I think it is, but again we say "worse" (line 461). I would say instead "but it does not on HasNS".
• Line 480, System's component mass ..., Implication of this sentence seems unclear. Maybe we could say that it's more due to the fact that the secondary mass is close to the NS maximum mass threshold.
• Line 579, may be add based on differences of its neighbors Agree.