Open tritemio opened 9 years ago
Maybe postpone or reject this?
As v0.5 (maybe 0.6 now if we include FLIM) is putting more information about detectors etc. into the setup
group, I think the is is a good idea, but I would rename it measurement_type
to stay consistent with naming from measurement_specs
.
There is already a measurement_type
field in /photon_data/measurement_specs
, see https://photon-hdf5.readthedocs.io/en/0.5.dev/phdata.html#measurement-specs
Looking at the description of the setup
group, https://photon-hdf5.readthedocs.io/en/0.5.dev/phdata.html#measurement-specs, it is clear that a "name" for it would be something like "YH 2002G" or "Single-spot usALEX setup". This is not the same as a "measurement type", I believe (many different types of measurements can be performed on the same setup).
I though it may be convenient to add a
name
(string) field to the setup group.A name will make easier identifying measurements files from different setups, especially if they don't have a
measurement_specs
group.