Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I claim this task
Original comment by cachel...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 3:46
Cachelion, I am feeling a bit kidded, what do you think this task is about? :-)
Original comment by webmas...@alexanderweb.de
on 1 Feb 2008 at 9:16
I claim this task too, we can battle it out ;-)
Original comment by flore...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 12:58
cachelion, please present any reason that makes you think that you are better
suited
to finish this task that florenzi.
Original comment by webmas...@alexanderweb.de
on 1 Feb 2008 at 1:07
Well, I use butterflies to program. Beat that.
(http://xkcd.com)
Original comment by flore...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 1:26
florenzi, no fair I have the earlier claim. also I have more experience in this
type
of work (not claiming tasks)
Original comment by cachel...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 1:27
I claim this task!!11!
Original comment by Thomas.J...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 1:31
I am pretty sure that our (the MoinMoin team's) non-existant FAQ would allow us
to
deny a claim even if was the first one under the precondition of a particular
weather condition. This is because we think that this non-existant FAQ is a
direct
translation of the rules.
So we have to decide based on true experience, knowledge and potential.
Personally, I prefer butterflies over allegedly claimed experience or deficient
ambitions pressing the shift-key on the keyboard. What do you think?
Original comment by webmas...@alexanderweb.de
on 1 Feb 2008 at 1:40
florenzi, I have yet to see visual evidence of your butterfly programming. on
the
other hand, I have not claimed a single task to this date: project
administrators can
attest to this fact. as for my deficient shift-key ambitions, I can attribute
this to
my fatal (but only) weakness: ncs (no capitalization syndrome)
Original comment by cachel...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 2:26
also, tw-pub...@gmx.de is cheating by claiming a task as a project
administrator, he
has an unfair advantage over other people.
Original comment by cachel...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 2:28
With regards to the shift key, I have to clarify that I meant this mysterious
Thomas
who is abusing his power by trying to claim a task as a project administrator.
Why do you think that not having claimed a single task ensures your success
here? Do
not forget that we all live in a performance society. And performance does not
mean
not having claimed a single task at all. We might want to consider referring to
some dead white men who prefer to talk about the struggle for social evolution
like
H. Spencer.
Any other idea that truely certifies your believe in your skills that allow you
to
incur this task?
Original comment by webmas...@alexanderweb.de
on 1 Feb 2008 at 2:57
I do not claim this Task
Original comment by E.Liubar...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 3:32
To claim or not to claim, that is the question;
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The tasks and challenges without fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing, end them? To run, to sleep.
Original comment by webmas...@alexanderweb.de
on 1 Feb 2008 at 4:05
cachelion, judging by your nickname, I would say you are unsuitable for this
task,
and are simply jealous of my amazing butterfly skills. Your name suggestions
you are
a lion, that is cached, but what proof of this do you have? For all we know you
could
simply be a zebra in disguise, or a disgruntled Indian employee from the huge
MoinMo.in server farm.
Thomas, ZOMG U R teh 13337!!!!!!
xorAxAx, personally I think you are just jealous too, and really want this task
for
yourself, but cannot claim it as you would be violating rule #240.
E.Liubarskij, I for one welcome our new task disclaiming overlords.
Original comment by flore...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 4:06
I leave you all with a poem:
Gur Mra bs Clguba, ol Gvz Crgref
Ornhgvshy vf orggre guna htyl.
Rkcyvpvg vf orggre guna vzcyvpvg.
Fvzcyr vf orggre guna pbzcyrk.
Pbzcyrk vf orggre guna pbzcyvpngrq.
Syng vf orggre guna arfgrq.
Fcnefr vf orggre guna qrafr.
Ernqnovyvgl pbhagf.
Fcrpvny pnfrf nera'g fcrpvny rabhtu gb oernx gur ehyrf.
Nygubhtu cenpgvpnyvgl orngf chevgl.
Reebef fubhyq arire cnff fvyragyl.
Hayrff rkcyvpvgyl fvyraprq.
Va gur snpr bs nzovthvgl, ershfr gur grzcgngvba gb thrff.
Gurer fubhyq or bar-- naq cersrenoyl bayl bar --boivbhf jnl gb qb vg.
Nygubhtu gung jnl znl abg or boivbhf ng svefg hayrff lbh'er Qhgpu.
Abj vf orggre guna arire.
Nygubhtu arire vf bsgra orggre guna *evtug* abj.
Vs gur vzcyrzragngvba vf uneq gb rkcynva, vg'f n onq vqrn.
Vs gur vzcyrzragngvba vf rnfl gb rkcynva, vg znl or n tbbq vqrn.
Anzrfcnprf ner bar ubaxvat terng vqrn -- yrg'f qb zber bs gubfr!
Original comment by flore...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2008 at 4:08
Finally killing this.
Thanks to everbody contributing!
Original comment by Thomas.J...@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2008 at 10:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Thomas.J...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2008 at 3:48