Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
trying to add everything that docutils depends on into out repository is not a
good idea. then we would have to include everything those dependencies require
and so on...
the os specific installer should handle the dependencies. which os has this
error?
Original comment by anup.parikh
on 9 Feb 2011 at 7:44
I thought that was the idea of putting everything on the svn. If this is the
thinking then we should take docutils out of svn and make the user install that
independently.
The error is in linux64. I could get docutils myself using sudo apt-get but
then it might not be in the right place per the settings of Red-R.
If you want to make this an exception then we should make the importing of
docutils an os specific procedure.
Original comment by kylecovi...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2011 at 7:56
for reports to work we need docutils snapshot 2010-07-21, r6380. the
docutils from apt-get is different from the one we have coded for, so
reports will fail.
I make the windows and mac installers internally consistent, so I can
manually include the correct docutils. It does not have to be part of the
svn. Its up to you how you want to handle this on linux.
Original comment by anup.parikh
on 9 Feb 2011 at 8:35
Original comment by anup.parikh
on 9 Feb 2011 at 11:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kylecovi...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2011 at 7:32