Closed zuta-osa77 closed 3 years ago
Hi Zuta,
Thank you a lot for your interest in Viral-Track ! Indeed it really seems that the parallelisation complitely failed during the QC generation step ... Could you tell me :
During the development of Viral-Track I usually put a comment character on line :
Best
Pierre
hi Pierre,
Before answering these I just checked the viral bam, found < 50 reads had aligned, and then just concatenated the R2 10X fastq files and ran kallisto quant on the viral index and found nearly the same result. It looks as though I have a poor signal generally so I'm going to tackle that prob;em first. But thanks for getting back to me -- I really think this tool will be useful when the virus is actually infecting the cell (as opposed to be circulating in eg plasma/serum).
best zo
Hi Zuta,
No problem ! Good luck with your experiment then :) I will close the issue and you can open a new one if needed later !
Hello,
I am testing VT and getting through the STAR alignment stages fine but running into what appear to be issues with doPar parallelizing R filtration of the 'viral bams'. As context, I only aligned to one viral reference (ie the index was host + single viral reference). I'm copying below the stdout and stderr for the entire Rscript call to Viral_Track_scanning.R. Any thoughts?
Also, given that I have gone through alignment and creation of the chromosome specific bams, is there a way to comment out some code in the scan to restart at the failure point (instead of redoing alignment again and again every time something downstream fails)?
Thanks! zuta