PingCAP-QE / ci

Continue intergration tests
Apache License 2.0
19 stars 96 forks source link

Define code ownership using "OWNERS" files in the central CI config repo #2976

Closed wuhuizuo closed 1 month ago

wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

Fixes #2975

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary of key changes:

  1. The pull request introduces the 'OWNERS' files to define code ownership and approvers for the CI scope of the tidb document repository.

  2. The file 'OWNERS_ALIASES' has been added, which contains the aliases for the group of approvers.

  3. The 'OWNERS' files have been added to the '/pipelines/pingcap/docs-cn', '/pipelines/pingcap/docs-tidb-operator', and '/pipelines/pingcap/docs' directories.

  4. The directory structure of the 'prow-jobs' has been changed. The files have been moved into sub-directories according to their respective categories.

  5. The 'kustomization.yaml' file has been updated to reflect the new file paths after the directory structure change.

Potential problems:

  1. Please make sure the users listed as approvers are aware of their responsibilities and agree to take them on.

  2. If there are automated systems that depend on the old file paths, those systems may break due to the change in file paths.

Suggestions to fix:

  1. Reach out to the users listed as approvers to make sure they are aware and agree to the responsibilities.

  2. Update any automated systems that depend on the old file paths to use the new paths.

  3. Test the changes thoroughly to ensure that the CI/CD pipeline works as expected with the new 'OWNERS' files and the updated directory structure.

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request is about defining code ownership using "OWNERS" files in the central CI configuration repository. Here are the key changes:

  1. A new shell script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh has been added. This script updates the kustomization.yaml file in the prow-jobs directory to reflect the current state of prow job yaml files.

  2. OWNERS, OWNERS_ALIASES files are updated and added respectively. They define the reviewers and approvers for code in the repository. The users lijie0123 and purelind have been modified as reviewers and approvers in the OWNERS files. Also, a set of new approvers have been defined in the OWNERS_ALIASES file.

  3. Several other OWNERS files under different directories are modified to update the list of approvers and reviewers.

  4. Many yaml files under prow-jobs directory are renamed and moved to new directories, and the kustomization.yaml file is updated accordingly.

  5. New README.md has been added under prow-jobs directory, with instructions on how to add a new job.

Potential Problems:

  1. The shell script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh is dependent on yq and git commands, these dependencies should be mentioned in the readme file, and they should be properly installed in the environment where this script would run.

  2. There is no check for syntax correctness in the yaml files, which could result in runtime errors.

  3. The error message in the shell script is not very descriptive and might not be enough for someone encountering the error to understand what they need to do to fix it.

Fixing Suggestions:

  1. Add a dependencies section in the readme file mentioning about the yq and git commands.

  2. Implement a yaml syntax check in the shell script to prevent potential runtime errors.

  3. Improve the error message in the script to provide more context and clear instruction to fix the error.

wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

/hold

wait me to solve the failed job, it not issue, but need to update or delete the job.

wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

/verify-owners

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The Pull Request (PR) is primarily focused on defining code ownership using "OWNERS" files in the central CI config repository.

Here are the key changes:

  1. Added a new bash script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh which updates the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml file based on the prow jobs yaml files present in the project. This script is used to ensure the kustomization file is up to date with the prow jobs.

  2. Updated the OWNERS file and introduced emeritus_reviewers, approvers.

  3. Created OWNERS_ALIASES file that holds aliases for the groups.

  4. Updated various OWNERS files in different directories, adding and removing reviewers and approvers.

  5. Renamed various yaml files and made changes to their content.

  6. Created a README.md file in prow-jobs directory detailing how to add a job.

Potential Problems:

  1. The bash script may not work as expected if the files or directories it is supposed to operate on do not exist or are moved.

  2. The OWNERS files changes will affect who has approval rights over different directories in the repo. This may potentially slow down the development process if not all approvers are active.

Fixing suggestions:

  1. Test the bash script thoroughly in different scenarios to ensure it works as expected.

  2. Make sure all the approvers and reviewers listed in the OWNERS files are active and willing to take on the responsibilities.

  3. It would be better to add more detailed comments in the PR description about the changes made, especially why certain files were renamed and why certain approvers and reviewers were added or removed.

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary of key changes:

  1. A new bash script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh is introduced to update the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml file. The script uses yq for processing YAML content and git diff for checking changes.

  2. The OWNERS files are updated across different directories to define code ownership. The emeritus_reviewers field is introduced and lijie0123 is moved to this field from reviewers/approvers in multiple directories.

  3. A new OWNERS_ALIASES file is introduced defining certain aliases and their associated users.

  4. Changes in the directory structure of prow-jobs with corresponding updates in prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml.

  5. Multiple changes in the presubmits.yaml files under prow-jobs.

Potential problems:

  1. The new bash script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh is not yet tested. If it does not function as expected, it might cause issues.

  2. The OWNERS files have been updated across multiple directories. If these updates are not in line with the actual responsibilities of the owners, it might cause issues.

  3. The changes introduced in presubmits.yaml files need to be properly reviewed to ensure they are not breaking the existing CI/CD pipeline.

Suggestions for fixing:

  1. Test the new bash script in an isolated environment before merging the pull request. If issues are found, fix them before final merging.

  2. Review the changes in the OWNERS files carefully. Ensure that the responsibilities assigned match the actual capabilities and capacities of the individuals or teams.

  3. Thoroughly review changes in presubmits.yaml files. Check if the changes introduce any potential breaking changes or security vulnerabilities. If found, fix them before merging the PR.

  4. Make sure the renaming of files and changing of file paths in prow-jobs are reflected in all places where they are referred to, to avoid breaking references.

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The key changes for this pull request are:

  1. A new script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh has been added. This script appears to be intended for updating a kustomization.yaml file by adding a list of yaml files from a directory and their key values.

  2. The OWNERS and OWNERS_ALIASES files were updated to redefine code ownership. The user lijie0123 has been moved to emeritus_reviewers and purelind has been added as an approver.

  3. Several OWNERS files were added to different directories, mainly in pipelines/pingcap/docs* directories and prow-jobs/pingcap/docs* directories. These files specify sig-approvers-docs as approvers.

  4. The structure and content of the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml file has been updated. It now uses a new way to map yaml files: key value pairs where keys are sequential three-digit numbers and values are paths to yaml files.

  5. Several yaml files have been renamed to reflect a new directory structure.

Potential Problems:

  1. The update-prow-job-kustomization.sh script does not have any error handling. If an error occurs during the execution of this script, it might not be caught and handled correctly.

  2. The script is using sed command to update kustomization.yaml. If the format of kustomization.yaml changes, the script might fail or produce incorrect results.

  3. Several directories and files are being renamed. This could potentially break any existing dependencies or configurations that are not accounted for in this pull request.

Suggestions:

  1. Add error handling in the update-prow-job-kustomization.sh script to catch and handle any errors that might occur during execution.

  2. Consider using a more robust method for updating kustomization.yaml. For example, you could use a programming language with yaml support to parse, update, and write the yaml file. This would be less prone to errors if the format of kustomization.yaml changes.

  3. Review the changes to file and directory names, and ensure that all dependencies and configurations are updated accordingly.

wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

/verify-owners

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request can be summarized as follows:

  1. The PR's main goal is to define code ownership using the "OWNERS" files in the central CI configuration repository. The "OWNERS" files are used to specify who can approve and review changes to specific parts of the codebase in the GitHub repository.

  2. The PR introduces a new shell script named update-prow-job-kustomization.sh to update the kustomization.yaml file with the latest configuration files in the prow-jobs directory.

  3. Changes are made in the "OWNERS" files. The user 'lijie0123' is moved from 'reviewers' and 'approvers' to 'emeritus_reviewers'. The user 'purelind' is added to 'approvers'.

  4. A new file named OWNERS_ALIASES is added, containing aliases for groups of approvers.

  5. The PR also includes changes to the structure of the prow-jobs directory, with configuration files being moved into subdirectories.

Potential problems:

  1. There is no description of why the user 'lijie0123' is moved to 'emeritus_reviewers'. If 'lijie0123' is still active, this could be a mistake.

  2. The new shell script update-prow-job-kustomization.sh does not have any error handling mechanism. It may fail silently if there is a problem updating the kustomization.yaml file.

  3. The PR does not have any test cases or validation to ensure that the changes do not break the existing functionality.

Suggestions for fixing the issues:

  1. Confirm with the team if the changes to the "OWNERS" files are correct and reflect the current roles of the team members.

  2. Add error handling and logging mechanism to the shell script update-prow-job-kustomization.sh to ensure any issues during the update process are caught and logged.

  3. Add test cases or validation steps to ensure the changes do not break any existing functionality. This could be done using automated testing or manual validation steps.

  4. The author should provide a more detailed PR description indicating the motivation behind the changes and explaining the changes in detail. This will help reviewers understand the context and reason for the changes.

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request titled "Define code ownership using "OWNERS" files in the central CI config repo" seeks to define the code ownership using the "OWNERS" files in the central CI configuration repository. Here are the key changes:

  1. The addition of a new bash script .ci/update-prow-job-kustomization.sh that modifies the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml file dynamically depending on the .yaml files present in the prow-jobs directory.

  2. Changes to the OWNERS files across various directories, adjusting the roles of several users. For instance, lijie0123 is moved from reviewers to emeritus_reviewers and purelind is added as an approver.

  3. The creation of a new OWNERS_ALIASES file which defines a group of approvers for the CI scope of the tidb document repository.

  4. The renaming and restructuring of a number of YAML files in the prow-jobs directory.

  5. Introduction of new OWNERS files in certain directories, defining the approvers for those directories.

Potential problems and suggestions:

  1. The bash script update-prow-job-kustomization.sh assumes that the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml file is always in the expected format and that configMapGenerator[0].files always exists. This could lead to issues if the file does not exist or is not in the expected format. To make the script more robust, consider adding checks for these conditions.

  2. The script also does not handle errors that may occur during the execution of the yq or git diff commands. To improve this, consider adding error handling to these command executions.

  3. The renaming and restructuring of files has been done manually. This may lead to errors if not done carefully. Consider using a script to automate this process to avoid potential human errors.

  4. The pull request does not contain any tests. It would be beneficial to add tests to ensure that the changes work as expected and do not introduce bugs.

  5. The pull request description does not provide a detailed explanation of the changes made. Providing a more comprehensive description would make the review process easier and more efficient.

  6. It's unclear if all the users mentioned in the OWNERS and OWNERS_ALIASES files have been communicated about the changes in their roles. Please ensure that these changes have been communicated and agreed upon by all parties involved.

  7. There are a lot of changes made in a single pull request, making it harder to review. Consider breaking down large changes into smaller, more manageable pull requests in the future.

wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

/approve

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/ci/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [wuhuizuo] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
wuhuizuo commented 1 month ago

/unhold