Open wuhuizuo opened 3 weeks ago
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Based on the pull request title, it seems that this pull request adds a Prow job for TikV's Raft Engine, which will run Rust tests on two different toolchains: Rust stable and Rust nightly.
The changes added in the pull request are contained in presubmits.yaml
file. The file is being added as a new file and it contains the configurations for the Prow job.
From the diff, it seems that the Prow job is well-defined and properly configured. The job is set to run the Rust tests on both Rust stable and Rust nightly toolchains, and it also includes the necessary commands to install and configure the toolchains.
However, there are a couple of suggestions for the pull request:
presubmits.yaml
file. It is recommended to add a newline at the end of the file to avoid any potential parsing issues.Overall, the changes seem good and the Prow job is well-configured. Therefore, the pull request can be approved after the suggested changes have been made.
/hold
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Based on the provided information, the pull request adds a new Prow job to the tikv/raft-engine
repository. The job runs two tests, one using the Rust nightly channel and another using the stable channel.
There are no obvious potential problems with this pull request, but it would be best to confirm that the new job runs as expected before merging it. Additionally, it may be helpful to add more information to the pull request description, such as why this job is being added and what it is testing.
As for fixing suggestions, it would be great to add more details about the tests being run in the job and any dependencies required. Also, it might be useful to add a comment in the kustomization.yaml
file indicating where the new tikv/raft-engine
job is located in the list of jobs for easier reference.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from wuhuizuo, ensuring that each of them provides their approval before proceeding. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Based on the pull request title and description, it appears that the changeset adds a new Prow job for the tikv/raft-engine
repository. The changeset modifies the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml
file by adding a new entry for the tikv/raft-engine
Prow job, and it also adds a new presubmits.yaml
file for the tikv/raft-engine
repository.
The changeset looks good overall, as it only adds new Prow jobs and does not modify any existing ones. However, there is one potential problem with the changeset. In the update-prow-job-kustomization.sh
script, the --exit-code
flag has been removed from the git diff
command. This means that the script will no longer exit with a non-zero status code if the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml
file is not up to date, which could lead to issues in the future if changes are made to the Prow jobs and the kustomization file is not updated accordingly.
To fix this issue, I suggest adding the --exit-code
flag back to the git diff
command in the update-prow-job-kustomization.sh
script. This will ensure that the script exits with a non-zero status code if the kustomization file is not up to date.
Other than this issue, the changeset looks good to me.
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Summary:
This pull request adds a new Prow job for the tikv/raft-engine
repository. It modifies the prow-jobs/kustomization.yaml
file to include the new job, and adds the new job's configuration file prow-jobs/tikv/raft-engine/presubmits.yaml
.
Potential problems:
There are no potential problems with this pull request.
Fixing suggestions:
No fixing suggestions required.
Additional comments:
The changes look good and are well documented. It's always good practice to include a description of the changes that have been made in the pull request description, which is done here.
Close #2935