Open carolinebeauchamp opened 1 month ago
Thanks for the report! I'll dig into it and let you know if I need more info. You can thank Jamf for the PITA inconsistencies in how things deal with Self Service in the Classic API - I've sent them long rants about it in the past ;-)
Also, congrats on submitting on the 10-year anniversary of ruby-jss being open-source!
Cheers, -Chris
Hi Caroline,
Can you send me the changes you made to fix things on your end? That'll speed up my process, and I can probably just integrate them, making sure all the other SelfServable objects behave properly.
Thanks! -Chris
Hi Chris,
Yay! 10 years, amazing 🍰 I yes, I thank Jamf every day for their wonderful API with it's extensive and detailed documentation! Spent many days recently with that joy ;)
I added in
in_ss_section_xml.add_element("deploy_automatically").text = "true"
in self_servable.rb
at line 859 (def add_in_self_service_xml(doc_root)
)
Like I said, very hacky to proof of concept it. Not quite sure how to implement it across all the different object types in a less hacky way :(
Thanks
Caroline
When creating a new MobileDeviceApplication, even when
in_self_service
is set tofalse
, the app is created as "In self service" and the self service tab appears in Jamf.Looking at the XML applied,
deployment_type
is set toInstall Automatically/Prompt Users to Install
, and this is applied successfully with no errors.What appears to be missing is the
deploy_automatically
attribute being included and set totrue
- I hacked this into the code and that made the app appear in the right place.I don't, however, know how that will affect all the other types of self-servable objects, as this code is shared between them all.