Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Is there a general list of what abstract parts of the protocol need to be
imported, and which are to be left out, I could try putting an archetype
together and throwing it on github. Is the wave protocol source in
third_party_src a modified trunk of wave protocol, or just a frozen copy used
to keep dependencies in line?
Are there repackaging license restrictions on some of the jars needed?
When I tried checking out the trunk of wave protocol and using it instead of
the jar'd copies, it really didn't work very well. I'm sure it can be juggled
into position, but if that juggling is done in maven, at least other developers
can check it out and start patching without jar-management nightmares...
...And I'm cool with sh update scripts, but a maven build script is platform
independent and future-friendly. It could make working on multiple branches a
lot easier, since each branch can exist as a source folder that can be turned
on or off to test.
Original comment by internetparty@wetheinter.net
on 2 Apr 2012 at 9:54
This has been brought up several times in the mailing list so you can easily
find previous discussions about this.
I had even started working on this but I believe I never got it fully working.
You can see what's done here:
https://github.com/nelsonsilva/wave-protocol/tree/maven/tools/maven
(It's an older version of the code base)
Original comment by nelson.s...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2012 at 10:03
I have no objections to mavenizing walkaround if it helps you and you are
willing to do the work. The first step would be to understand the script
get-third-party-deps; that should answer most of your questions.
If mavenizing walkaround also requires mavenizing Apache Wave, you might get
objections from there, though.
Original comment by oh...@google.com
on 2 Apr 2012 at 11:16
Ahh, yes; I sort of assumed as much. I'm putting together a PlayN project,
which is heavily mavenized, which I intend to use as my universal frontend for
all platforms, and then drop the wave server into the browser editor platform.
It may take a while to get to the backend, but it's on my list, so mavenizing
of walkaround will have to happen eventually, even if just as a dependency in
the web module. =}
I am definitely willing to do the work, but between my day job and my frontend,
it could be a while. If anyone else on the list is interested, I am down for
collaboration.
In regards to apache wave, I'm not actually sure how many shared dependencies
there are, or if they will be getting updates; if the shared code is relatively
stable, it wouldn't be that hard to just mavenize the bits needed for
walkaround and leave the apache project to their own devices.
Thank you!
Original comment by internetparty@wetheinter.net
on 19 Apr 2012 at 9:32
You have your work pretty much completed at https://github.com/pires/wave
Original comment by pjpi...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2012 at 3:54
See also https://github.com/goodow/wave and https://github.com/goodow/walkaround
Original comment by i...@goodow.com
on 12 Sep 2012 at 12:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
internetparty@wetheinter.net
on 2 Apr 2012 at 9:29