Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
s/lazarus/winff/
Original comment by hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 10:47
backtrace :
[WARNING] Out of OEM specific VK codes, changing to unassigned
[WARNING] Out of unassigned VK codes, assigning $FF
[FORMS.PP] ExceptionOccurred
Sender=EAccessViolation
Exception=Access violation
Stack trace:
$031950CE
$0829096C
$081C12CB
$081C053A
$0817FA0C
$0817F605
$081805DA
$0817FAD5
$0817F605
$081805DA
$0817FAD5
$0807A681
$0807F902
$080809D9
$0817F605
$081805DA
$08087A0E
TApplication.HandleException Access violation
Stack trace:
$031950CE
$0829096C
$081C12CB
$081C053A
$0817FA0C
$0817F605
$081805DA
$0817FAD5
$0817F605
$081805DA
$0817FAD5
$0807A681
$0807F902
$080809D9
$0817F605
$081805DA
$08087A0E
Original comment by hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 10:48
Please have a look at bug 55. Are you by any change running GTK using the
QTcurve library? Anyway, it would really help if you installed the winff-dbg
package and get the backtrace again with debugging information.
Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com
on 22 Aug 2010 at 5:29
I am using Fedora 13 GNOME. And as I have noticed in Debian packages also, -dbg
packages are missing the source due to maybe missing -gw flag during
compilation.
Is there any way I can add that flag ?
Original comment by hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2010 at 7:03
Could you please elaborate on what you are missing in the -dbg package? That
package, as far as I know, ONLY contains the debugging symbols for the
back-tracing. What does the -gw flag do (is this a pascal flag or something
more general)?
Also an other question: which version of lazarus is used? We have found that it
contains a bug preventing winff to compile correctly. In Debian this is fixed
from version 0.9.28.2-10.
Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com
on 22 Aug 2010 at 7:49
Thanks, the two patches from debian fixed the issue for me, you can close the
bug now
Original comment by hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2010 at 8:49
Do you mean that you fixed lazarus and could fix the fedora package to compile
a correct winff?
Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com
on 23 Aug 2010 at 5:31
Original comment by poipodec...@hotmail.com
on 23 Aug 2010 at 5:32
Yes patching lazarus fixed winff build :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626233
Original comment by hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2010 at 11:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
hicham.h...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 10:46