Open ares1977 opened 3 years ago
Not like this requires a lot on server side: https://github.com/mjtechguy/wireguard-site-to-site
I am also missing site2site tunnel support. I try to run every application in docker container and it is not problem to run separate containter for WIREGUARD (or in host itself), but than I am missing the information about client IP (and identity) between containers or host and container.
This is more a feature request than a bug, but I do not have permissions to set labels.
As I can see, this project is oriented towards a client-server architecture, allowing users to easily setup a road warrior environment, and it does it very well. But I think it would be great if it could also provide the possibility of creating site-to-site connections.