PlantPhenoHack2017 / HackTopics

Use the issue tracker of this repo to suggest topics for hacking.
0 stars 0 forks source link

Share / harmonize pipelines for greenhouse systems #4

Open dlebauer opened 7 years ago

dlebauer commented 7 years ago

Perhaps these should be separate issues, but I could imagine one developer from each interested team work on teaching each other how to use / deploy their tools. At the end a good summary of similarities and differences, and opportunities to share the effort.

Compare, contrast, exchange methods for extracting raw images from LT systems in order to work with images outside of LT software.

Deploy PlantCV, pipeline at Arkansas, Purdue, and or UNL

Exchange hyperspectral pipelines b/w TERRA REF, UNL, other users.

Deploy Arkansas metadata capture front end to the Lemnatec database at Arkansas, UNL, how to

westerman commented 7 years ago

@dlebauer You mentioned "...TERRAREF has a specification for sensor metadata and data formats. ..." Is there a link to these specs? Thanks.

dlebauer commented 7 years ago

@craig-willis can you please summarize/ link to your work?

craig-willis commented 7 years ago

This is a work in progress, but we've started centralizing the collection of fixed sensor information including specifications, documentation, and metadata in the TERRA-REF sensor data repository (Clowder). An early approach to fixed sensor metadata with some description is in github (https://github.com/terraref/sensor-metadata). The initial version is based on a format provided by LemnaTec for the Field Scanalzer, but we've been working to provide a general specification as more sites come online.

Please note that this is really focused on fixed (authority) metadata about devices and sensors, intended to capture specific properties/characteristics that might be useful for algorithm developers downstream.

nfahlgren commented 7 years ago

I would be interested in participating in this group at the hackathon. Reiterating what @dlebauer said above, I would love to have a setup something like the following at the Danforth Center:

  1. Users of our phenotyping system(s) register their experimental design/metadata before the actual experiment using the Arkansas web portal (at Arkansas or local implementation), using the MIAPPE (or similar) standards.
  2. When accessing data for analysis, we have a tool (extended from ours and/or the UNL tool) that can access the data in the LemnaTec database and the Arkansas portal, and locally stores the image and metadata in a standard way.
  3. PlantCV, Image Harvest, etc. can read the local store of data and metadata for analysis.
  4. Output results, traits, metadata, etc. are standardized as much as possible for integration with other analysis tools, BETYdb, back into the Arkansas portal, etc.

Other thoughts to add on to this: