Open marieALaporte opened 7 years ago
Yes, roles are potentially problematic. How many are there?
On 6 Jun 2017, at 10:34, Marie-Angélique Laporte wrote:
I am checking the exposure-chebi.tsv file for the patterns.
Should we make a separate file for the eo/peco classes that map to a chebi role? and have separate yaml file for those with a nested definition or something like that?
@austinmeier @cmungall @cooperl09
-- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/Planteome/plant-environment-ontology/issues/98
Only a few. 10 to be exact. Here the list:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_27027=micronutrient, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_33281=antimicrobial agent, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_25944=pesticide, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_37845=growth hormone, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24527=herbicide, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24127=fungicide, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_33287=fertilizer, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_22676=auxin, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23530=cytokinin, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24852=insecticide
@cmungall shall we make a DP for them ? Something like for the fertilizer:
'plant treatment'
and 'has exposure stimulus'
some ('chemical entity' and 'has role' some 'fertilizer')
Perfect. In GO we precoordinated classes like this, as we couldn't handle the nesting. Here it's OK (but may be a bit before we can handle in AmiGO).
Be careful with the nutrient branch of CHEBI, it's human-specific. You may get odd inferences for micronutrient.
I think we need our own mini plant nutrient role ontology (or chemical-with-nutrient-role ontology)
was this fixed?
I am checking the exposure-chebi.tsv file for the patterns.
Should we make a separate file for the eo/peco classes that map to a chebi role? and have separate yaml file for those with a nested definition or something like that?
@austinmeier @cmungall @cooperl09