Open eucristian opened 5 years ago
I'll update the README more formally at a later point, but informally, we expect the amortized performance of the two to be pretty much the same. Here "amortized" means you've logged a particular log message more than a few times.
The reason for this difference is that NanoLog C++17 executes additional logic when it encounters a log message it's never seen before. However, this only happens at most once per unique log message statement and the logic is fairly simple (grab a lock and push a pointer on a vector). After that point, the two implementations are nearly identical, so we do not expect their amortized performance to vary very much.
Hello,
Could you please update the ReadMe with the expected performance difference(in your opinion) between the pre-processor version and the C++17 one? Thank you very much