When a Jedi Master crosses over, they become a Dark Jedi Master (and vice versa). This applies to the possibility of crossing Luke Skywalker The Last Jedi - he should generate +1 activation for DS instead of for LS after crossing.
The issue with Luke TLJ crossing but still generating for LS came up in a casual game around March 2021.
The crossed character card takes on a new card title matching their new persona name. For example any crossed Luke card is now titled "Son Of Vader" for the remainder of game, even if it leaves table, gets retrieved, returns to table, etc. (Other Luke cards in the LS deck do not change title). If this is very difficult to program, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It is very rare for this to matter in a game. It could matter for Abyss/Chasm though.
Although a crossed Vader becomes titled "Anakin Skywalker", LS may still play the interrupt also titled Anakin Skywalker (this is an exception to uniqueness rules).
The current rulings post also has clarifications numbered "4" and "5" but there is no actual change there, just updated explanations.
When a Jedi Master crosses over, they become a Dark Jedi Master (and vice versa). This applies to the possibility of crossing Luke Skywalker The Last Jedi - he should generate +1 activation for DS instead of for LS after crossing. The issue with Luke TLJ crossing but still generating for LS came up in a casual game around March 2021.
The crossed character card takes on a new card title matching their new persona name. For example any crossed Luke card is now titled "Son Of Vader" for the remainder of game, even if it leaves table, gets retrieved, returns to table, etc. (Other Luke cards in the LS deck do not change title). If this is very difficult to program, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It is very rare for this to matter in a game. It could matter for Abyss/Chasm though.
Although a crossed Vader becomes titled "Anakin Skywalker", LS may still play the interrupt also titled Anakin Skywalker (this is an exception to uniqueness rules).
The current rulings post also has clarifications numbered "4" and "5" but there is no actual change there, just updated explanations.