Closed Ind2022 closed 7 months ago
Hi, How many samples do you have? Also it appears your mutation load is quite low.
CC: @ShixiangWang
Thank you for your reply. I have 4 samples in first set and on 2nd set there are 3 samples. Kindly let me know if it will be fine to use this results or derived signatures.
Hi,
I would not use maftools for signature analysis with this low no. of samples. You should consider other tools such as deconstructSigs that can work at the sample level.
Thanks for the suggestion. Does this method will do a similarity analysis with Cosmic signatures as maftools does because that's what we are trying to accomplish.
It won't extract any new signatures and compare them to COSMIC. It's meant to get the composition of known COSMIC signatures within each sample.
Also does deconstructSigs work with mouse genome rather than human. I am not finding any ref for mouse genome with deconstructSigs
@Ind2022 Signature fitting is suitable for your data as @PoisonAlien suggested. Use the SigProfiler Assignment https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/signatures/assignment/ or my sigminer sig_fit (https://shixiangwang.github.io/sigminer-book/basic-workflow.html#reference-signature-fitting) function as alternative is recommended.
Thank you for your response. Like I have mentioned above does these methods work with mouse genome and where can I find mouse genome reference file like maftools provide.
Thanks again.
Hi,
maftools does not provide any reference genomes. It uses BSGenome object to get the sequences. Please have a look at Bioconductor BSgenome
packages for your mouse builds.
I don't know how well these signatures translate to the mouse genome, you will have to research these independently.
They both support the mouse genome. You should check corresponding usage/tutorial. @PoisonAlien I think this could be close now.
@Ind2022 Signature fitting is suitable for your data as @PoisonAlien suggested. Use the SigProfiler Assignment https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/signatures/assignment/ or my sigminer sig_fit (https://shixiangwang.github.io/sigminer-book/basic-workflow.html#reference-signature-fitting) function as alternative is recommended.
Thank you for your replies.
Describe the issue
Command Dear Maftools support,
I am using maftools, NMF and sigminer R packages for construction of signature plots from a whole exome data from 2 sets of data, whole exome. I did use "nrun = 100" and pConstant = 0.01.
While I am able to create the signatures but the diagnostic plots doesn't look all right i.e there is drop at 3 then again it goes up in cophenetic plot from first plot . And it second plot there is no drop, its a straight line.
Please advice if these plots looks fine.
There are 2 sets of data run, so I am sharing 2 plot sets below.
Thank you.