Closed joshuagraber closed 8 months ago
I usually leave comments when I see stuff in my github notifications, but I see this is a draft. Not getting into it deeper yet, but thanks for publishing!
cc @josh-chamberlain @mbodeantor @kalenluciano 👀 This one is ready for review. Quite a big PR, but it forms the foundation for the component library, etc., that we want to build on top of this.
Nice! Based on "note any differences in styling" it seems like you're expecting there to be differences in appearance, right? Lot of little changes from the old demo.html
to the new one. Or, maybe I didn't run it properly. Clearly you've considered and put in the readme instructions for how people should implement this across projects which is good, and the "To test" part of this PR worked for me.
For my part of the review I will need some time to talk this through, ask basic questions, and make sure I understand. Maybe we could all talk sometime soon just to get on the same page, as this is so foundational.
Removing my request for review because this passes my tests. Leaving it up to Marty (w/ Kalen's feedback)
Resolves #9, resolves #4
demo.html
to target built CSSdemo.html
for better accessibility (nav)"1.1.0"
README
andCONTRIBUTING
)To test
npm run build
Opendemo.html
with live server, compare with pdap.io, note any differences in stylingnpm link
pdap.io
ordata-sources-app
would work), runnpm link pdap-design-system
andnpm run build
pdap-design-system --copy-assets --to=test-directory
and ensure that the assets are copied over to a dir called/test-directory
in the root of the project.