Open MaxGhenis opened 1 year ago
If they used the same parameters, are we saying that cliff = mtr > x?
Yep cliff == MTR > 100%
But this wouldn't fit with our current MTR chart since we're holding non-firsy adults' income constant. But maybe the cliff approach, where x axis is total household earnings, makes more sense there, too?
Currently we compute MTRs with a delta of $1,000 (hard-coded), and compute cliffs with a delta of $2,000 (parameterized). The adult parameters are also both set to 1. Can we align these to use the same parameters?