Open MaxGhenis opened 9 months ago
Ah it's because the disabled UBI supplement goes off is_ssi_disabled
, which does not consider blindness:
We capture blind people in microsimulation because we set it directly in cps.py:
The current workaround in the household page is to set ssi_reported > 0
, e.g. this.
But we should base the disability supplement on some other variable that also works on households directly for blind people.
For example, this scenario has a $6,186 disability UBI, but the blind individual only receives the adult amount @nikhilwoodruff https://policyengine.org/us/household?reform=42434&focus=householdOutput.netIncome®ion=enhanced_us&timePeriod=2023&baseline=2&household=38407