Closed MaxGhenis closed 2 years ago
Just checked @MaxGhenis - both of these examples are now corrected for me ($0, and $228m).
This (or something like it) has resurfaced, e.g. this reform that replaces SNAP/TANF/SSI with a $100/mo adult UBI has a top-level budgetary impact way too high and misaligned with the budgetary impact chart. That chart also shows tax savings where none should exist.
This link in https://github.com/PolicyEngine/policyengine/issues/903#issuecomment-1214285562 works correctly after making an unrelated update to PolicyEngine. But I'm leaving it open until we diagnose and fix it.
it's back - this occurred around 12:45pm PT
We have a major bug. Could be something with the baseline? We should probably shut off the app until we pin it down.
An empty reform is showing $10tn in impact: https://policyengine.org/us/population-impact
A minor Maryland reform is showing billions in impact (should be tens or hundreds of millions): https://policyengine.org/us/population-impact?md_cdcc_percent=0&md_non_single_childless_non_refundable_eitc_match=0&md_eitc_refundable_match=0&baseline_state_specific=MD