Closed AthenaAugousta closed 10 months ago
Unfortunately it did not work out:
2023-08-29 14:05:26] {Undefined function or variable "aerBsc532_klett_d1".
Error in poliphon_one (line 198) POLIPHON1.aerBsc532_klett_d1 = aerBsc532_klett_d1;
Error in picassoProcV3 (line 2847) [POLIPHON1] = poliphon_one ...
Good news. With the latest version, the chain is running without problems and nc files are created!
Great!!!
Now the picky things: Could you please homogenize the variable names in the output? Currently we use uncertainty*** for the error estimates but you used err***.
Could you rename it? At a certain point we may think about the names in general, but for now it would be great to keep some consistency.
In general, but maybe for a future version it would be also great to source out everything that could be adjusted to the config file.
In your case it would be: Dd = [0.23, 0.31, 0.25]; Dnd = [0.05, 0.05, 0.05];
If you like you can try by now or in a later version.
That's great to hear!
Thanks for pointing out the naming inconsistency, I will change it accordingly. Also, if you find something else that can be improved, please let me know.
Congratulations, the new commit worked without problems! @AthenaAugousta
You did a great job and accomplished to implement a new product to the PPC. This qualifies you to give the next PollyNET webinar under the tentative title: Adding new products/features to PollyNET Processing Chain - experiences from a newcomer" ;-) - which I think would be really warmly welcomed by all the other who want to contribute but do not yet really know how to start!
Hey @HolgerPollyNet, could you check how it performs now?