Open 1286710929 opened 3 years ago
the published code do not have CANet branch, not coordinated with the paper report, the baseline of SFANet is 59 according to my exp, however, when I add ASPP(means using the M-SFANet model according to the author's code) the SHA MAE is only 61, ridiculous, the res in the paper can not be reproduced (i do not know whether the reviewer of ICPR know this thing)
I train the datasets of shanghai A and B. But I find that the result (MAE) of SFANet is 68.02 and 10.32 for A and B. The process of the experiment is completely in accordance with your article. And I use the model from UCF data set for pre-training